Map · Book 1: Of the Understanding · Part 2: Of the ideas of space and time · T 1.2.4 Objections answer'd
T 1.2.4.9
SBN 42 · cited directly by 0 papers, reached by 1 more through page or section ranges
A surface is defin'd to be length and breadth without depth: A line to be length without breadth or depth: A point to be what has neither length, breadth nor depth. 'Tis evident that all this is perfectly unintelligible upon any other supposition than that of the composition of extension by indivisible points or atoms. How else cou'd any thing exist without length, without breadth, or without depth?
Who cites it
0 of 1 paper cites this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.
| Paper | Cited as | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Spector 1998 | THN 1.4.2.42 T 1.2.4 (4 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …osition of the continued existence of perceptions and objects is a "fallacy" and "error" (THN 1.4.2.42, p. 210). 36THN 1.… |