T 1.2.2.4
SBN 31 · cited directly by 1 paper, reached by 2 more through page or section ranges
All this reasoning takes place with regard to time; along with an additional argument, which it may be proper to take notice of. 'Tis a property inseparable from time, and which in a manner constitutes its essence, that each of its parts succeeds another, and that none of them, however contiguous, can ever be co-existent. For the same reason, that the year 1737. cannot concur with the present year 1738. every moment must be distinct from, and posterior or antecedent to another. 'Tis certain then, that time, as it exists, must be compos'd of indivisible moments. For if in time we could never arrive at an end of division, and if each moment, as it succeeds another, were not perfectly single and indivisible, there would be an infinite number of co-existent moments, or parts of time; which I believe will be allow'd to be an arrant contradiction.
Who cites it
1 of 3 papers cite this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.
| Paper | Cited as | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pitson 2013 | T 1.2.2.4 this paragraph Citation pattern | …T 2.1.7.4, 2.1.8.2-3; SBN 296, 299-300). 21 There are similar references concerning time (T 1.2.2.4; SBN 31); power and… |
| Spector 1998 | 1.2.2 T 1.2.2 (12 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …oral Concerns..........................................................................5 1.2.2 Questioning the Fit… |
| 1.2.2 T 1.2.2 (12 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …and the Selves of Book 2," Hume Studies, vol. 18, no. 2 (November 1992), pp. 281-292. ## 1.2.2 Questioning the Fit… | |
| 1.2.2 T 1.2.2 (12 paragraphs) Citation pattern | … 65The individuation problem is on of the common criticisms of Hume's bundle theory. See 1.2.2 for a discussion of… | |
| Garrett 2001 | (p. 31) T 1.2.2 (4 paragraphs) Checked by model | … images as incompatible with the "doctrine of infinite divisibility"' as applied to space (p. 31)? This question is r… |