T 1.2.5.26 n12
SBN 638-9 · cited directly by 1 paper, reached by 2 more through page or section ranges
As long as we confine our speculations to the appearances of objects to our senses, without entering into disquisitions concerning their real nature and operations, we are safe from all difficulties, and can never be embarrass'd by any question. Thus, if it be ask'd, whether the invisible and intangible distance, interpos'd betwixt two objects, be something or nothing: 'Tis easy to answer, that it is something, viz. a property of the objects, which affect the senses after such a particular manner. If it be ask'd, whether two objects, having such a distance betwixt them, touch or not: It may be answer'd, that this depends upon the definition of the word, touch. If objects be said to touch, when there is nothing sensible interpos'd betwixt them, these objects touch: If objects be said to touch, when their images strike contiguous parts of the eye, |and when the hand feels both objects successively, without any interpos'd motion, these objects do not touch. The appearances of objects to our senses are all consistent; and no difficulties can ever arise, but from the obscurity of the terms we make use of. If we carry our enquiry beyond the appearances of objects to the senses, I am afraid, that most of our conclusions will be full of scepticism and uncertainty. Thus if it be ask'd, whether or not the invisible and intangible distance be always full of body, or of something that by an improvement of our organs might become visible or tangible, I must acknowledge, that I find no very decisive arguments on either side; tho' I am inclin'd to the contrary opinion, as being more suitable to vulgar and popular notions. If the Newtonian philosophy be rightly understood it will be found to mean no more. A vacuum is asserted: That is, bodies are said to be plac'd after such a manner, as to receive bodies betwixt them, without impulsion or penetration. The real nature of this position of bodies is unknown. We are only acquainted with its effects on the senses, and its power of receiving body. Nothing is more suitable to that philosophy, than a modest scepticism to a certain degree, and a fair confession of ignorance in subjects, that exceed all human capacity.
Who cites it
1 of 3 papers cite this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.
| Paper | Cited as | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pitson 2013 | SBN 638 T 1.2.4.31 to T 1.2.5.26 n12 (2 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …r confession of ignorance in subjects, that exceed all human capacity" (T 1.2.5.26 n. 12; SBN 638). Modesty as "a dif… |
| SBN 64, 638 T 1.2.5.25 to T 1.2.5.26 n12 (6 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …erties by which objects or bodies reveal themselves to us (T 1.2.5.26, including note 12; SBN 64, 638). This enables us t… | |
| Loeb 1992 | 1.2.5 T 1.2.5 (30 paragraphs) Citation pattern | … any thing unchangeable be ever said to have duration. (T 37) He returns to the theme in 1.2.5: 226Hume Studies A… |
| Strawson 2011 | 1.2.5 T 1.2.5 (30 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …heresomewhere(withaceteri sparibusclausetocoverglitchesinthebrainofthesortdiscussedin60-1/1.2.5. 20),althoughwedon'… |