Treatise Mapping
Map · Book 1: Of the Understanding · Part 2: Of the ideas of space and time · T 1.2.4 Objections answer'd

T 1.2.4.6

SBN 41 · cited directly by 0 papers, reached by 1 more through page or section ranges

Taking then penetration in this sense, for the annihilation of one body upon its approach to another, I ask any one, if he sees a necessity, that a colour'd or tangible point shou'd be annihilated upon the approach of another colour'd or tangible point? On the contrary, does he not evidently perceive, that from the union of these points there results an object, which is compounded and divisible, and may be distinguish'd into two parts, of which each preserves its existence distinct and separate, notwithstanding its contiguity to the other? Let him aid his fancy by conceiving these points to be of different colours, the better to prevent their coalition and confusion. A blue and a red point may surely lie contiguous without any penetration or annihilation. For if they cannot, what possibly can become of them? Whether shall the red or the blue be annihilated? Or if these colours unite into one, what new colour will they produce by their union?

Who cites it

0 of 1 paper cites this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.

PaperCited asContext
Rocknak 2012
focused
T 1.4.2.41
T 1.2.4 (4 paragraphs)
Citation pattern
…"continu'd and uninterrupted being" ( T 1.4.2.40; SBN 208), and a "continu'd existence" ( T 1.4.2.41; SBN 208) and, "the…