Map · Book 1: Of the Understanding · Part 2: Of the ideas of space and time · T 1.2.4 Objections answer'd
T 1.2.4.13
SBN 43 · cited directly by 0 papers, reached by 2 more through page or section ranges
In refuting this answer I shall not insist on the argument, which I have already sufficiently explain'd, that if it be impossible for the mind to arrive at a minimum in its ideas, its capacity must be infinite, in order to comprehend the infinite number of parts, of which its idea of any extension wou'd be compos'd. I shall here endeavour to find some new absurdities in this reasoning.
Who cites it
0 of 2 papers cite this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.
| Paper | Cited as | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Swain 2006 focused | T 1.4.2.43 T 1.2.4 (6 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …he distinctness of the distinct objects of perception, which is the case with the vulgar (T 1.4.2.43; SBN 209), or they … |
| Rocknak 2019 | T 1.4.2.43-53 T 1.2.4.10 to T 1.2.5.1 (26 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …to the senses," where he discusses the philosopher's rejection of the vulgar perspective (T 1.4.2.43-53; SBN 209-16). Hume'… |