T 1.1.1.5
SBN 3-4 · cited directly by 0 papers, reached by 2 more through page or section ranges
I perceive, therefore, that tho' there is in general a great resemblance betwixt our complex impressions and ideas, yet the rule is not universally true, that they are exact copies of each other. We may next consider how the case stands with our simple perceptions. After the most accurate examination, of which I am capable, I venture to affirm, that the rule here holds without any exception, and that every simple idea has a simple impression, which resembles it; and every simple impression a correspondent idea. That idea of red, which we form in the dark, and that impression, which strikes our eyes in sun-shine, differ only in degree, not in nature. That the case is the same with all our simple impressions and ideas, 'tis impossible to prove by a particular enumeration of them. Every one may satisfy himself |in this point by running over as many as he pleases. But if any one should deny this universal resemblance, I know no way of convincing him, but by desiring him to shew a simple impression, that has not a correspondent idea, or a simple idea, that has not a correspondent impression. If he does not answer this challenge, as 'tis certain he cannot, we may from his silence and our own observation establish our conclusion.
Who cites it
0 of 2 papers cite this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.
| Paper | Cited as | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ainslie 2008 focused | T 1.1.1 T 1.1.1 (13 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …sts of man discover many causal connections between perceptions: impressions cause ideas (T 1.1.1), the idea of a fut… |
| Loeb 2009 | (T pp. 4,104-5,175) T 1.1.1.5 to T 1.3.15.12 (10 paragraphs) Citation pattern | …4). Hume is aware, however, that some regularities 'arise from chance', are 'acci dental' (T pp. 4,104-5,175); in Liii.13, non-ac… |