Treatise Mapping
Map · Introduction

T 0.3

SBN xiv-v · cited directly by 2 papers

From hence in my opinion arises that common prejudice against metaphysical reasonings of all kinds, even amongst those, who profess themselves scholars, and have a just value for every other part of literature. By metaphysical reasonings, they do not understand those on any particular branch of science, but every kind of argument, which is any way abstruse, and requires some attention to be comprehended. We have so often lost our labour in such researches, that we commonly reject them without hesitation, and resolve, if we must for ever be a prey to errors and delusions, that they shall at least be natural and entertaining. And indeed nothing but the most determined scepticism, along with a great degree of indolence, can justify this aversion to metaphysics. For if truth be at all within the reach of human capacity, 'tis certain it must lie very deep and abstruse; and to hope we shall arrive at it without pains, while the greatest geniuses have failed with the utmost pains, must certainly |be esteemed sufficiently vain and presumptuous. I pretend to no such advantage in the philosophy I am going to unfold, and would esteem it a strong presumption against it, were it so very easy and obvious.

Who cites it

2 of 2 papers cite this paragraph directly; the rest reach it through a page or section range. Snippets are the words around each citation.

PaperCited asContext
Kail 2008SBN xv
Introduction (3 paragraphs)
Citation pattern
…horoughly acquainted with the extent and force of human understanding' (T Introduction 4; SBN xv). For Hume 'all the…
SBN xv
Introduction (3 paragraphs)
Citation pattern
…e 'all the sciences have a relation, greater or less, to human nature' (T Introduction 4; SBN xv), and for Malebranc…
Greco 2015SBN xv
Introduction (3 paragraphs)
Citation pattern
…ial both whether Hume recognizes the foundations of his whole "science of MAN" (T Intro 4/SBN xv) only in the powers…